Cap and Trade like Health Bill

I just wrote about the unfortunately compromised Health Care bill passed by the House. It is a bill that started out with the intention to help the American people and by the time it was done the health care lobbyists had turned it into something much less. It is not like there are no good things in the bill and that it isn't an improvement over what we had previously but it is still weak.

It has been weakened by corporate lobbyists. So instead of getting bill that will actually work we get some kind of weird half measure that does as much for the corporate interests involved as it does for the American people. We can't win anymore.

The proof is in the other half measure legislation being put forward in the form of the Waxman-Markey cap and trade bill passed by the House. I just did a story at OhMyGov about a couple of EPA attorneys who have done a fantastic You Tube video called "A Huge Mistake." They argue that cap and trade can't work because the corporate interests involved always find a way to get around the new rules and actually turn it around to make a profit from it.

A seemingly innocuous part of the bill called carbon offsets are actually giant loop holes that the corporate interests are ready and anxious to jump through. An example provided by Laurie Williams and Alan Zabel, the two attorneys involved, is "suppose that a landowner is paid not to cut his forest so that it can continue capturing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Purchasing this offset allows owners of a coal-fired power plant to burn extra coal, above the cap."

The problems with this, says Williams and Zabel, is that somebody like Weyerhauser will just cut down a different forest and somebody else gets to spray more carbons in the air with the offset. It is "untrackable shifting economic activity and perverse incentives such as these are inherent problems for carbon offset that cannot be solved by certification or verification processes."

In some countries where carbon offsets are happening, like Great Britain, corporations actually lobby for them because they've managed to make them profitable without having to give up a thing. In fact, the carbon offsets give the pollutant actual value thus creating an incentive to produce it. Personally, I'm pretty sure that was not the original intention of the legislation but what emerges after it's been modified by corporate interests.

It is a pretty simple equation for the rest of us: Politicians + Corporate Lobbyists = Profits/Campaign funds for both of them. Not much for us but a weak bill that pretends to be something that it isn't.

And the reality is.........................

There are a lot of progressives out there right now who are pretty darn disappointed at the direction the health care bill has taken. They seem to have the impression that they handed the Democrats a majority in the House and Senate and that now, finally, we would be able to take the country in a different direction. Now they can't help wondering how it is that such a weak, corporate and GOP friendly bill is being put forward.


It isn't as if we all didn't just witness a Republican administration without a majority in the last four years still manage to get pretty much whatever it wanted. All they had to do was threaten to call a Democrat unpatriotic and they crumpled like tissue paper. The tax breaks for the wealthy were retained, nobody was ever investigated for ever and ever more obvious crimes, and the beat went on.

The reason is because the Bush administration and his GOP cohorts in the House and Senate never put anything forward that wasn't extremely popular with Corporate America. And if they like it then they'll find Democrats who like it too.

So, why can't the Democrats with a popular President and a super majority in the Senate do the same thing? The truth is that they could if they wanted to. The reality is that they are as deeply owned by corporate interests as their colleagues in the Republican party.

They talk a good game to their constituents and MSNBC but when push comes to shove they are going to take into consideration the interests of the lobbyists who are in their face with money and information 24/7 more than us. We are being given excuses like they just didn't have the votes because the blue dog Dems wouldn't budge. Ever hear that kind of rubbish from Tom Delay?

Personally, I think that Nancy Pelosi is one of the most capable Speakers we've had for a long time but she's not going to challenge the entrenched powers. Perhaps we are expecting too much. This is big legislation after all. Sometimes we get this crazy idea that we actually might have some kind of relevant opinion but we really don't. Not in Corporate America.

Chicken Little needs to Shut up!

Clearly the weekend news programs are hurting for material these days. I mean what is there to talk about outside of the failing economy, the new President's agenda, the occupation of Iraq, the civil war in Afghanistan, and global warming. With so few interesting things to choose from it should come as no surprise that our radar like media chose none of the above.

No, what our ever vigilant media representatives thought it best for the American people to hear was Dick Cheney talking. The fact that his 9% approval ratings indicate a certain loathing for the man by the American people doesn't seem to register on their media minds. Perhaps all a person of former power needs to to is crook his little finger and the media can't help but come running.

Sooooo, what are we left with? The Today show opens on Monday with the most venerable of newsmen, Matt Lauer, trumpeting his opening news headline 'Dick Cheney says we are not as safe as we used to be because we don't torture anymore.'

May I offer this alternative as an opener for the Today show, "The Vice President who said we were going to be nuked by Iraq says we need to keep torturing. More on the Chicken Little story later in the show."

The Science is called Evolution not Darwinism!

I don't want to beat an old horse but there are just some things that I can't let slide. Shocking it may be but this time my beef with the View is not with Ms. Hasselbeck but with her co-host Sherri Shephard. Now Sherri seems like a very nice person whom I also find quite amusing at times. I've wanted to give her the benefit of the doubt but Monday was the last straw.

In a bit of irony I spent some of my Saturday washing floors while listening to the NPR on the radio. I regret that I don't remember the name of the book or the author that was being interviewed but it was about science. The author has written a book about scientific theory in a way that is simple for everybody to understand. The interview was lively, entertaining, and informative. One of the many scientific topics that were touched upon was evolution. The scientist pointed out that even though the media tries to make it an issue the debate about evolution is over in the real world.

Perhaps the ladies on the View should spend some of their time listening to informative and informed people rather than twittering their "friends." To my utter and total disgust on Monday Ms. Walters brought up the recent case in California where a teacher was held responsible for noting to his class that creationism is pseudo science. She then proceeds to talk about this as if it was an open question. Really, Barbara, according to who? If you mean the Christian fundamentalists who are trying to force their religion down everybody's throats then I guess you're right but since when do we take our cues from them?

This discussion is not valid for a public program unless it's Billy Graham where you know your viewers all share your beliefs/delusions. I mean, what is next for the great brains on the View? Maybe we can have Sherri weigh in on whether the earth is flat or not? (Oh wait, she already did that and she wasn't sure???!!!!!) Or how about whether certain types of people of particular shapes and colors have smaller brains than white people? Perhaps a lively discussion about whether or not blood transfusions will change you as a person?

These suggestions are all previously held beliefs that have been scientifically debunked just like this new fake creationism. In the case of creationism as science all I can say is that if your equation has "then a miracle occurs" somewhere in it then it's not science. For these women to indicate otherwise on a major network is both stupid and irresponsible.

When Whoopi popped out with "I just don't know why we can't teach both," apparently nobody from the group was able to point out that we have a separation of church and state and creationism is religion so it would be illegal. I've known Republicans who are more informed than that. But I think Sherri's ignorance and hypocrisy are the most annoying.

Perhaps she should explain to the viewers of the View how she can trust science to operate on her child's eyes and not trust them in the area of Adam and Eve? If the surgeon had told her before the operation that I'm going to do A., B., C., and then I'll hope a miracle occurs because I never bothered to learn it myself, and then if that works I'll proceed to D. Do you think Sherri would have sent her child under the knife based on some kind of hopeful, miracleish kind of operation? I can only assume the answer would be no considering she spends the rest of the time talking about what a wonderful mother she is.

At least Joy Behar had the good sense to point out to her that if she didn't allow her child to learn about evolution then he probably wouldn't get in to college. That pretty much sums up where we are on the debate. It's over everywhere except in some parts of the South and on The View.

Defection of Specter a Reflection of the Times for Republicans

I was pretty amazed when I heard the news of Senator Specters defection to the Democrats. I've always known he was a moderate but I've heard him carry the water for the RNC too many times to believe he was a friend to Democrats. In truth the switch by Specter is more about pointing out the problems with the Republican party than with helping Democrats carry a majority in the Senate.

I've written about this before and I'm hardly a voice in the wilderness since journalists with ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN and MSNBC have also talked about it. That is that the Republican party is becoming increasingly far right and thus irrelevant politically. The only news network (and I use the term "news" very, very loosely in this case) that hasn't noticed the precipitous decline is FOX and that isn't much of a surprise.

And what has been so amazing about this whole thing is that it is the Republicans themselves who continue to shovel the hole deeper. It is as if they were all lined up at the top of the water slide ready to watch each other as they leap off and plummet down the shoot while their fellows cheer them on their way. Each time a thoughtful person in line says something like "maybe this isn't such a good idea" they are derided and dismissed as being out of touch with real Republicans.

Even as they watch their poll numbers drop they continue to be just as they always have been. Cut taxes for the rich and corporations, strong military, and citizens are on their own. Despite the fact that those very same citizens decided loudly and clearly they didn't want to do it that way anymore they just don't get it. Apparently the old saying "the definition of insanity is to keep doing things the same way and expect different results" has never crossed any of their desks.

For the Republicans these days it is Limbaugh, Hannity, O'Reilly, and the rest of that loony group who sets their agenda. But even though these creeps have high ratings on TV and radio the Republicans should realize that they're still talking to a very small portion of the country. With that being true then it means that they've decided that appealing to only about 20% of America is okay. Call me crazy but you need more than 20% of the vote to win an election.

I am concerned though because in a Democracy you need more than one political party. Our Democracy is already in trouble if we let the free press die off so we can't add this to the mix. I appeal to the saner heads in the Republicans to not be afraid to stand up to the haters and liars and actually try and do something positive for the country.

Specter is just another ugly poll number for the Republican party. He is an indicator of the direction they are heading. Between the poll numbers and the departure of some of their most important members one might think they'd take notice this time. Limbaugh's response of "good riddance and take McCain and his daughter with you," is our indicator that they must really like the view from the bottom. Don't look for any changes soon.

I'm Quickly Losing Interest in "The View"

It's too bad because I've only been watching them over the last six months or so and they've lost me already. The thing that gave them relevancy and interest was the election and now that it's over they've become irrelevant again. I'm sure their increased popularity at the end of last year will linger for a while but unless they change their ways I think people are going to start heading for the exits with me.

Today was a perfect example of why they are no longer worth watching. First of all I was very excited to hear Whoopi bring up an actually important topic this morning. She talked about the fact that our President has said that he isn't against investigating torture and the folks who authored it. The crowd responded with a cheer showing that they agree with our President and then the whole thing went right down the crapper.

The ladies on the show allowed Elizabeth Hasselbeck to filibuster the response! What???? It's not as if we don't already know what that idiot thinks. Did Whoopi, Joy, and Barbara (Sherry's not worth mentioning when discussing anything requiring serious thought), think that Elizabeth was going to offer anything more than her usual Republican talking points? So, thanks to her co- hosts, we were all treated to her usual method of don't stop to breathe or somebody might get a word in edge wise defense of the indefensible.

Elizabeth actually said that Barack Obama would do the same thing if he thought it would save the country. What kind of an idiot comment is this? If Joy, Barbara or Whoopi can't step in at this point and say something obvious like "how the hell do you know that?" then what are they there for? I guess Joy managed to point out to Mrs. Hasselbeck that her past favorite candidate, John McCain, didn't believe in torture or that torture worked. Elizabeth had no response to that except to continue to defend the behavior. What a good Christian!

It would seem obvious to anybody that the country is not for torture and they think it should be looked into. Perhaps we can look to the last election where even Republicans (not Elizabeth clearly) steered away from the candidates who screamed the loudest for blood and instead did the opposite of what Rush wanted and nominated John McCain. Polls consistently show that Americans don't support and never supported torture.

If "The View" wants to hold onto it's new audience they better start giving us more than one 'view.' Especially if that particular view is one that is only espoused by a small minority of Americans. We can find that on Fox News.

Tea Bagging is a Joke

The GOP is constantly surpassing even themselves for practicing the fine art of cynical politics. The romantic notion of political ideas gaining acceptance via the actions of normal, everyday Americans who create a grass roots movement has now been kidnapped and mutated by the Republican party. If you've been asking yourself if there is a low where they will not go then you can see it won't be at this level.

I'm talking, of course, about this manufactured Tea Bagging day on April 15th. Fox News needs a reason to be viewed these days by anybody other than the koolaid drinkers. The 'supposed' leaders of the GOP need a reason to even exist. They're desperately searching for a message that Americans can get behind and this is what they've come up with.

The fact that anybody looking at it with any amount of perspective can see that the movement is drummed up by Fox News is of no concern to them. They are just hoping that it catches the eye of the 'normal' media and then somehow given some credibility. So far it isn't happening that way. A true test may be if Jim Lehrer pays any attention to it during the Lehrer hour. Hopefully the GOP influence with PBS has been somewhat negated since the departure of the Bush administration.

The ironic part of the whole thing is the fact that these protesters are protesting Bush's taxes not Obama's. They themselves don't really understand that little factoid judging from the unfortunate remarks some of them have made to reporters. If the man who guarantees that Obama is not an American citizen is an example of the groups overall grasp of reality then clearly none of them are rowing with both oars in the water.

The only thing that gives them any credibility at all is the presence of Fox News and that speaks volumes all by itself.